# What is a decision boundary?

by Stephen M. Walker II, Co-Founder / CEO

## What is a decision boundary?

A decision boundary is a hypersurface in machine learning that separates different classes in a feature space. It represents the area where the model's prediction shifts from one class to another. For instance, in a two-dimensional feature space, the decision boundary could be a line or curve that separates two classes in a binary classification problem. It helps the model distinguish between different classes, thereby enabling accurate predictions on unseen data.

The decision boundary is learned during the training phase of a machine learning model and is then used to predict the class of unseen data points. The nature and complexity of the decision boundary can vary depending on the problem at hand, the data available, the chosen model, and the learning process.

There are different types of decision boundaries, including linear and non-linear. A linear decision boundary is a straight line that separates the data into two classes and is used when the classification problem is linearly separable. On the other hand, a non-linear decision boundary is a curved line that separates the data into two or more classes.

The decision boundary's accuracy and generalization capabilities are crucial. If the boundary is well-defined and cleanly separates the classes, the model's predictions' accuracy increases. However, if the decision boundary is too precise or 'overfits' the training data, it might not generalize well to new data. Conversely, a decision boundary might not be accurate enough if it's too flexible or doesn't fit the data well.

In terms of visualization, decision boundaries can be plotted to understand the model's classification behavior better. For example, in Python, you can use libraries like matplotlib or seaborn to plot the decision boundary of a model.

## How are decision boundaries used in machine learning?

Decision boundaries are a fundamental concept in machine learning, particularly in classification tasks. They represent the surface or line that separates different groups of data points in the feature space. During training, a machine learning algorithm learns this decision boundary, which it then uses to predict the class of unseen data points.

The decision boundary is not a property of the training data but rather a property of the classifier. Different classifiers can lead to different decision boundaries. For instance, in logistic regression, the decision boundary is a straight line, while in nonlinear classification methods, like neural networks, the decision boundary can be a curve.

The complexity of the decision boundary is determined by the model and the features used. Simple models like logistic regression or linear support vector machines (SVMs) often produce linear decision boundaries, while more complex models like neural networks or k-nearest neighbors (KNN) can produce nonlinear decision boundaries.

The quality of the decision boundary significantly impacts the effectiveness of a machine learning model. Precise and well-defined decision boundaries contribute to enhanced classification accuracy, thereby influencing the overall predictive capabilities of AI models. However, it's important to note that decision boundaries are not always clear cut, especially in fuzzy logic-based classification algorithms where membership in one class or another is ambiguous.

In the context of imbalanced data, the decision boundary can be biased towards the majority class, which may introduce some bias in the prediction of the minority class. Adjustments in the decision threshold can mitigate this bias unless the class imbalance is extreme.

In the case of neural networks, the type of decision boundary that the network can learn is determined by the number of hidden layers. If it has no hidden layers, then it can only learn linear problems. If it has one hidden layer, then it can learn any continuous function.

## What are some common methods for finding decision boundaries?

There are several common methods for finding decision boundaries:

1. Linear Classification — Linear decision boundaries are linear functions of the input features. They are (D-1) dimensional hyperplanes in a D-dimensional input space. For instance, a set of 3-dimensional features will have 2D decision boundaries (planes), and a set of 2-dimensional features will have 1D decision boundaries (lines).

2. Non-linear Classification — Non-linear decision boundaries can be achieved by transforming the feature space or using specific models like neural networks. For instance, a neural network with hidden layers can learn non-linear decision boundaries.

3. Kernel Trick — The kernel trick is a method used in Support Vector Machines (SVMs) to create non-linear decision boundaries. It involves mapping the data into a higher-dimensional space where the decision boundary can be linear. This process is similar to how hidden layers in neural networks solve the non-linear decision boundary problem.

4. Decision Trees and Neural Networks — Decision boundaries can also be generated using decision trees and neural networks. These methods can create complex decision boundaries that can handle non-linearly separable data.

5. Logistic Regression — Logistic regression can generate non-linear decision boundaries by processing the input features in a specific way, such as using polynomial logistic regression.

The choice of method depends on the complexity of the model, the feature set, and the nature of the problem at hand. It's also important to consider the trade-off between model complexity and the risk of overfitting or underfitting the data.

## How can decision boundaries be optimized for better performance?

Optimizing decision boundaries can significantly improve the performance of machine learning models. Here are some strategies to achieve this:

1. Boundary Thickness — Thick decision boundaries can lead to improved performance and robustness, while thin decision boundaries can lead to overfitting. Therefore, it can be beneficial to design learning algorithms that explicitly increase boundary thickness.

2. Flexibility and Precision — The decision boundary should be flexible enough to accommodate the complexity of the data, including outliers. However, it should also be precise enough to accurately separate different classes. Overly flexible boundaries may not fit the data well, while overly precise boundaries may overfit the training data and not generalize well to new data.

3. Mitigating Class-Boundary Label Uncertainty — The decision boundary can be adapted to accommodate more boundary training samples, which can improve training accuracy. However, this can result in a more complex classification model.

4. Boundary Smoothing — Smoothing the decision boundaries can help avoid overfitting. This can be achieved by eliminating border instances.

5. Nearest Neighbors — The decision boundaries can be improved by performing a weighted average of the prediction of a sample and its nearest neighbors. This approach does not require any modification to the network architecture, training procedure, or dataset.

6. Bias-Variance Tradeoff — The complexity of the decision boundary can impact the bias-variance tradeoff. For instance, with smaller values of k in k-nearest neighbors (kNN), the decision boundaries are jagged and complex (high variance), but simple and straight for larger values of k (high bias). Thus, an optimal balance between bias and variance needs to be achieved for better performance.

7. Rejection Option-based Classification (ROC) — This technique assumes that most discrimination occurs when a model is least certain of the prediction, i.e., around the decision boundary. By exploiting the low confidence region of a classifier for discrimination reduction, bias in model predictions can be reduced.

The choice of strategy depends on the specific problem and the nature of the data. It's also important to visualize and analyze decision boundaries during both training and testing to understand how they evolve and to find potential defects.

## What is the relationship between decision boundaries and class-boundary label uncertainty?

The relationship between decision boundaries and class-boundary label uncertainty is centered around the trade-off between model complexity and the ability to generalize to unseen data. When a classification model's decision boundary is fine-tuned to accommodate more boundary training samples, it may improve training accuracy due to lower bias but at the cost of potentially higher variance, which can hurt generalization. This fine-tuning increases model complexity and can lead to overfitting, where the model performs well on the training data but poorly on new, unseen data.

Class-boundary label uncertainty arises when there is ambiguity or noise in the labels of the training data, which can be due to various factors such as subjective labeling processes or inherent overlaps between classes. If a decision boundary is extended to include an inaccurately labeled point, it can increase both bias and variance in the model.

To mitigate the effects of class-boundary label uncertainty, one approach is to estimate the pointwise label uncertainty of the training set and adjust the learning process accordingly. This means that samples with uncertain labels have a smaller influence on the objective function of the model's learning process, which can help reduce both bias and variance. This approach recognizes that not all training samples should be treated equally, especially when there is evidence to suggest that some labels are less reliable than others.

The relationship between decision boundaries and class-boundary label uncertainty is a balancing act where the goal is to achieve a decision boundary that is accurate and generalizable without being overly complex or sensitive to label noise. Methods that account for label uncertainty aim to improve the robustness of the decision boundary by reducing the influence of uncertain labels on the model's learning process.

## What is the difference between linear and non-linear decision boundaries?

The difference between linear and non-linear decision boundaries lies in their complexity and the type of data they can separate.

A linear decision boundary is a straight line (in two dimensions), a plane (in three dimensions), or a hyperplane (in more than three dimensions) that separates different classes in a feature space. Linear decision boundaries are used when the data is linearly separable, meaning that a straight line or plane can separate the classes without any misclassification. Linear decision boundaries are simpler and easier to interpret but may not perform well when the data is not linearly separable.

On the other hand, a non-linear decision boundary can be a curve or a more complex shape that separates different classes in a feature space. Non-linear decision boundaries are used when the data is not linearly separable, meaning that a straight line or plane cannot separate the classes without misclassification. Non-linear decision boundaries can handle more complex data distributions and can lead to more accurate classifications when the data is not linearly separable. However, they are more complex and harder to interpret.

In terms of classifiers, linear classifiers like logistic regression or linear support vector machines (SVMs) often produce linear decision boundaries, while non-linear classifiers like neural networks or k-nearest neighbors (KNN) can produce non-linear decision boundaries. For instance, in SVMs, a technique called the kernel trick is used to transform the data into a higher-dimensional space where the decision boundary can be linear, even though it appears non-linear in the original feature space.

## More terms

### BBHard Eval: Pushing the Limits of AI Understanding

BBHard Eval is a rigorous benchmark in AI for understanding and predicting complex scenarios. It involves predicting the outcome of intricate video or text narratives, requiring a profound understanding of the world and human behavior.

### MixEval Benchmark for Open LLMs

MixEval is a benchmark designed to evaluate the performance of language models by combining traditional benchmarks with real-world user queries. It aims to provide a more accurate and cost-effective evaluation compared to other methods.