Start

Grade every model against what your reps actually did

Klu turns your CRM history into the answer key. When a new model ships, it reruns lead routing, reply drafts, and call notes and tells you which ones to switch.

Describe your use caseSee a sample report
Inbound lead qualificationSonnet 5.5 release
Switch to Sonnet 5.5 Medium. Same agreement with your SDRs, 58% cheaper per lead.
SDR agreement, Opus 5.5 High88.6%→ today
SDR agreement, Sonnet 5.5 Medium88.1%→ −0.5 pts
Cost per 1,000 leads, Sonnet 5.5 Medium$16.10▼ −58%
p95 time to route, Sonnet 5.5 Medium3.1s▼ −4.2s
Scored on 1,000 closed inbound leads against each SDR's disposition and whether an opportunity opened within 90 days.

Graded on what the rep did next

Klu weights each run the way your sales leaders would. A cheaper model can't win by inventing a next step or answering someone who asked to be removed.

01
Matches the repSame disposition, field, or reply
40%
02
Nothing inventedEvery claim traces to the call or CRM record
25%
03
Safe to sendOpt-outs honored, no unapproved pricing
15%
04
Cost and speedPer 1,000 leads, p95 time to respond
20%

MiMo-V2.6-Pro outranks GPT-6 at $0.54

GDPval compares real work from 44 occupations head to head. Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 5.5 lead. Grok 4.7 at $3 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro at $0.54 both outrank GPT-6 Astra. Klu reruns these models on your CRM history.

GDPval110 models · Oct 7, 2026
Elo
1
Opus 5.5 Max$8 per 1M
1866
2
Sonnet 5.5 Max$4 per 1M
1839
3
Fable 5.1 Max$20 per 1M
1758
4
Grok 4.7 Xhigh$3 per 1M
1715
5
MiMo-V2.6-Pro$0.54 per 1M
1686
11
Gemini 4 Argon High$4 per 1M
1626
17
GPT-6.1 Sol Max$4 per 1M
1575
19
GPT-6 Astra Max$20 per 1M
1542

Where sales teams use Klu

Each one starts with a default way to score it, built from records your CRM already holds. Change it if yours differs.

Matches the SDR's call

Inbound lead qualification

Score form fills against your ICP and route them. Graded on whether the model accepts or rejects a lead the way your SDR did, and on which leads became pipeline.

Matches what the rep sent

Reply drafting

Tag a prospect's reply and draft the response. Compared with the email the rep sent. An unsubscribe tagged as interest fails the case.

Field-level match

Call notes to CRM

Turn a call transcript into next step, close date, and MEDDPICC fields. Checked field by field against what the rep saved after the call.

Approved answers only

RFP and security questionnaires

Draft answers from your approved library. Graded against what your sales engineer submitted. Claiming a certification you don't hold fails the case.

Your reps already wrote the answer key

Every lead has a disposition. Every reply has the email the rep sent. Every call has the fields the rep saved afterward. Klu grades each model against that record and fails any claim the call or the CRM can't back up.

Call notes to CRM, case 214Haiku 4.5
Next stepRep saved: Security review, Oct 14Model wrote: Security review, Oct 14Match
Close dateRep saved: Nov 28Model wrote: Nov 28Match
Economic buyerRep saved: VP FinanceModel wrote: Not capturedMissed
Decision criteriaRep saved: SSO, SOC 2 reportModel wrote: SSO, SOC 2, on-premNot in call
Paper processRep saved: Legal review, 2 weeksModel wrote: Legal review, 2 weeksMatch
CompetitionRep saved: Incumbent renews in Q1Model wrote: Incumbent renews in Q1Match
4 of 6 fields matchOn-prem never came up on the call, so the case fails

One line per workflow, scored on what your reps did

When a model ships, Klu reruns each sales workflow on the same cases and tells you which to switch, which to keep, and why, in the terms your RevOps lead uses.

Sonnet 5.5 releaseReport ready 1 hr after release
Lead qualificationSwitchSonnet 5.5 Medium
▼ −58% costagreement −0.5 pts
Reply draftingKeepOpus 5.5 High
▼ 3 missed opt-outsSonnet 5.5's best
Call notes to CRMSwitchSonnet 5.5 High
▲ +2.6 ptsfield match, −31% cost
RFP answersKeepOpus 5.5 High
→ +0.4 ptssame within ±2 pts

Find your best model

Autopilot for peak performance, lowest price
Checked when labs ship

Get startedTalk to sales